I think I understand that these bikes were designed to be used with 63-80mm forks, not 100-120mm forks. I have heard a few of you mention that the handling will be poor, it won't turn well, and other performance problems due to the geometry being thrown off, larger turning radius, etc.
As some may remember, the first photos I posted of my XX I was sporting a Quadra 21R and a Ringle 0 rise stem. I then put the Manitou Black on with the same stem. This was seriously awkward (as was the original setup but I got used it after a few rides) so I changed to a stem with some rise and some handlebars with rise and the handling issues were solved. I have been riding this setup for a while now and I can't tell that it isn't responsive or suffering from poor handling except the steep in the saddle climbing issues.
Now I admit, it does look a little funny and certainly isn't period correct but since I was going for comfort and performance I feel like I achieved my goals. The old forks I have used are quite lackluster compared to the Black, though they were quite a bit lighter. I have looked at the geometry, turning radius primarily, and I understand the concept of rake and trail from riding motorcycles, which makes sense when operating at high speeds that even a slightly longer arc will have a noticeable effect on handling, but on a bike at relatively slow speeds? I am not convinced it makes any difference.
Enlighten me oh great and wise Cuda heads!
Most importantly though my steed is reliably hauling me to work and home everyd; gotta love commuting!
) but when I get around to switching the fork out I will make sure to do some testing of sorts.
